Because I've always felt a wonder at old photographs not easy to explain. Maybe I don't need to explain; maybe you'll recognize what I mean. I mean the sense of wonder, staring at the strange clothes and vanished backgrounds, at knowing that what you're seeing was once real. That light really did reflect into a lens from these lost faces and objects. That these people were really there once, smiling into a camera. You could have walked into the scene then, touched those people, and spoken to them. You could actually have gone into that strange outmoded old building and seen what now you never can - what was just inside the door.

The wonder is even stronger with old stereoscopic views - the almost, but not quite, identical pair of photographs mounted side by side on stiff cardboard, that, looked at through the viewer, give a miraculous effect of depth. It's never been a mystery to me why the whole country was once crazy about them. Because the good ones, the really clear sharp photographs, are so real: Insert a view, slide it into focus, and the old scene leaps out at you, astonishingly three-dimensional. And then, for me, the awe becomes intense. Because now you really see the arrested moment, so actual it seems that if you watch intently, the life caught here must continue. That the raised horse's hoof so startlingly distinct in the foreground must move down to the solidness of pavement below it again; those carriage wheels revolve, the girl walk closer, the man move on out of the scene. The feeling that the tantalizing reality of the vanished moment might somehow be seized - that if you watch long enough you might detect that first nearly imperceptible movement - is the answer to the question Kate has asked me more than once: "How can you sit there so long--you hardly move! - staring endlessly at the very same picture?"

12 March, 2011

A group of friends

These tintypes fascinated me when I bought them. In many of the photographs from this early period, people look so serious, rather like the photographer told them not to smile. This group appear to be having fun, smiling, and look like the sort of people I would like to meet. They are reaching out of the past making my time travel much easier. I would love to know who they are (one man looks like an ancestor of the English actor Charles Dance).

Click image to enlarge
I don't know all that much about Tintype photographs other than the fact that there is no negative as there is in photography with film. The image on the Tintype is a mirror image and rather dark. You can see the original scan of the six images below. In my "framed" adjusted images I have flipped them to make them appear like modern photographs, and lightened them.
Click image to enlarge
Because there was no negative, I wonder if it was possible to make a copy print? Some of the Tintypes appear to be the same - how quickly could two images be taken by the photographer? If you know the answers please send me a message on this blog.

Click image to enlarge

The original Tintypes as scanned (click image to enlarge).


16 February, 2011

Hobdens Royal Baths, Brighton

Here is a follow-up photograph to my previous blog entry showing the young actors. In that I stated that the photographic studios of Hennah & Kent were right next to the Metropole Hotel. Well here is an early CDV of the Metropole, but next door are Hobdens Royal Baths. Perhaps the street numbering has changed over the years? Can anyone help me out here? Further information about the Baths can be found here.

Click image for a larger version
Some close up sections and the original photograph are shown below.




09 February, 2011

Young actors in 1877

I'm turning the dial of my time machine back to May 13th, 1877, 134 years ago in Brighton on the Sussex coast. Here (linked to Google street view) at 108 King's Road, were the studios of Hennah & Kent, artist photographers, miniature and portrait painters. They were located right on the seafront next to the famous Brighton Metropole hotel, and across the road from the West Pier which opened 11 years earlier in 1866.

Click image for larger version.

This unusual cabinet photograph shows two young actors, according to the note written on the back, by the name of D. Beresford and L. Close "in the Acting".

Thomas Henry Hennah and William Henry Kent were at the same address for 30 years, from 1854 until 1884. More information here.

 

28 January, 2011

Brighton & Hove Albion v Swindon, 1921 crowd

There is something fascinating about looking at people. Sometimes it is fun to just sit on a bench on the sea front and watch people walk past. Without knowing them or where they are going, it is fun to guess what they are like and what they are going to do. People are very odd sometimes.

Using my time machine, I can go back to the football pitch just before the start of the match between Third Division South rivals Brighton & Hove Albion and Swindon Town. The league table for that year shows that Brighton finished fourth and Swindon ninth, but I have been unable to find out the result of the match. However, I'm not looking at the game, I'm looking at the people watching it . . . and a fascinating lot they are too!

(Click on this image for a larger version)

I collect the photographs of the brothers Wiles of Hove. They visited Brighton matches to take photographs to sell to the fans after the game for 3d each (just over 1p in today's money). They would be shocked by the prices that have to be paid today for their work.

A young man in sailor's uniform is from the HMS Conqueror, launched in 1911, but sold for scrap just a year after this photograph was taken.

How many people can you see without a hat?

The original scan is shown below, together with the back which shows it to be on postcard paper.


18 January, 2011

Lord and Lady Farnham on the Remuera in 1914?

Click on the picture for a larger view.

This photograph printed on postcard paper is a real puzzle. According to a hand written note on the back, the photograph shows Lord and Lady Farnham of Eire. The people in the picture do appear as if they could be on board an old ship, but just look at the area where they are sitting - hardly somewhere where you would expect to see a Lord and Lady! Perhaps the writer is just being funny? Some of the writing has been crossed through, but it has not been obliterated.

And then there are the dates: 1938 written at top left, and 1914 bottom right. I am inclined to think 1914 is accurate, and the voyages were numbered by the shipping company, so voyage 6 could have been added by someone researching the card in the past. There was a real Lord Farnham, Arthur Maxwell, an Irish Republican peer and ex-soldier who lived at Farnham, County Cavan, Eire. He would have been 35 years old in 1914. This image may be a photographic copy of a photograph or lantern slide because there is an area of black background around the picture area (see small original image below). The picture is also numbered, bottom right, with an “8”, indicating that it was part of a series.

If you can tell me anything at all about Lord Farnham that helps make sense of this photograph, please write a comment on this blog.